Criterion
2: Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes (100)
2.1.
Program Curriculum
2.1.1. State the
process for designing the program curriculum
Process used to
demonstrate how the program curriculum is evolved and periodically reviewed
considering the POs and PSOs. Also consider the involvement of the Industry.
2.1.2.
Structure of the Curriculum
Refer to SAR:
Expectation in 2.1.2 & 2.1.3 is that the curriculum is well balanced
structure &
appropriate for a
degree program.
2.1.3.
State curriculum the components of the curriculum.
Refer to SAR:
Expectation in 2.1.2 & 2.1.3 is that the curriculum is well balanced
structure &
appropriate for a
degree program
2.1.4.
State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes (POs) & Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs).
Process used to identify
extent of compliance of curriculum for attaining POs & PSOs (10)
2.2.
Teaching-Learning Processes
2.2.1.
Describe the Process followed to improve quality of Teaching Learning.
A. Adherence
to Academic Calendar (2)
B. Pedagogical
initiatives (2)
C. Methodologies
to support weak students and encourage bright students (2)
D. Quality
of classroom teaching (Observation in a Class) (2)
E. Conduct
of experiments (Observation in Lab) (2)
F. Continuous
Assessment in the laboratory (3)
G. Student
feedback of teaching learning process and actions taken (2)
(A. Availability
of Academic Calendar based on University academic calendar and its effective
compliance
B. Documentary
evidence to support implementation of pedagogical initiatives such as real-life
examples, collaborative learning, ICT supported learning, interactive class
rooms etc.
C. Guidelines
to identify weak and bright students; post identification actions taken; impact
observed
D. Class
room ambience; efforts to keep students engaged (also to be verified during
interaction with the students)
E. Quality
of laboratory experience with respect to conducting, recording observations,
analysis etc. (also to be verified during interaction with the students)
F. Internal
Semester examination and internal marks thereof, Practical record books, each
experiment assessment, final marks based on assessment of all the experiments
and other assessments; if any
G. Feedback
format, frequency, analysis and actions taken (also to be verified during
interaction with students))
2.2.2.
Quality of end semester examination, internal semester question papers,
assignments and evaluation.
A. Process for internal semester question paper setting and
evaluation and effective process
implementation (3)
B. Process to ensure questions from outcomes/learning levels
perspective (2)
C. Evidence of COs coverage in class test / mid-term tests (5)
D. Quality of Assignment and its relevance to COs (5)
(A. Process
of internal semester question paper setting, model answers, evaluation and its
compliance
B. Question
paper validation to ensure desired standard from outcome attainment perspective
as well as learning levels perspective
C. Mapping
of questions with the Course outcomes
D. Assignments
to promote self-learning, survey of contents from multiple sources, assignment evaluation
and feedback to the students, mapping with the
Cos)
2.2.3.
Quality of student projects
A. Identification
of projects and allocation methodology to Faculty Members (2)
B. Types
and relevance of the projects and their contribution towards attainment of POs
and
PSOs (2)
C. Project
related to Industry (3)
D. Process
for monitoring and evaluation (2)
E. Process
to assess individual and team performance (3)
F. Quality
of completed projects/working prototypes (5)
G. Evidences
of papers published /Awards received by projects etc. (3)
(A. Projects
identification and guide allocation Process
B. Projects
classification (application, product, research, review etc.) consideration to
factors such as environment, safety, ethics, cost, standards and
mapping
with program outcomes and program specific outcomes
C. Continuous
monitoring mechanism and evaluation
D. Methodology
(Appropriately documented) to assess individual contribution/understanding of
the project as well as collective
contribution/understanding
E. Based
on Projects demonstration
F. Quality
of place (host) where the paper has been published /quality of competition in
which award has been won.)
2.2.4.
Initiatives related to industry interaction.
A. Industry
supported laboratories (2)
B. Industry
involvement in the program design and Curriculum. (3)
C. Industry
involvement in partial delivery of any regular courses for students (3)
D. Impact
analysis of industry institute interaction and actions taken thereof (2)
(A. Type
of Industries, Type of Labs, objectives, utilization and effectiveness
B. Documentary
evidence
C. Analysis
and actions taken thereof)
2.2.5.
Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training.
A. Industrial
training/tours for students (2)
B. Industrial
/internship /summer training of more than two weeks and post training
Assessment
(3)
C. Impact
analysis of industrial training (2)
D. Student
feedback on initiative (3)
(A. & B. Type of
Industries, planned or non-planned activity, objectives clearly defined, no. of
students participated, relevant area of training, visit report documented)
(C.&
D. Impact analysis and feedback format, analysis and actions taken (also to be
verified during interaction with students)
0 Comments