Criterion
5: Faculty Information and Contributions (200)
5.1.
Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR)
Marks to be given proportionally from a
maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR between 15:1 to 25:1, and zero
for average SFR higher than 25:1. Marks distribution is given as below:
< = 15
- 20 Marks
< = 17
- 18 Marks
< = 19
- 16 Marks
< = 21
- 14 Marks
< = 23
- 12 Marks
< = 25
- 10 Marks
>
25 - 0 Marks
• SFR is
to be verified considering the faculty of the entire department.
• No. of
Regular faculty calculation considering Regular faculty definition*;
Faculty appointment letters, time table, subject allocation file, salary
statements.
• No. of
students calculation as mentioned in the SAR(please refer table under criterion
5.1)
• Faculty
Qualification as per AICTE guidelines shall only be counted
5.2.
Faculty Cadre Proportion
Cadre
Proportion Marks =
• If AF1
= AF2= 0 then zero marks
• Maximum
marks to be limited if it exceeds 20 (Refer calculation in SAR)
5.3.
Faculty Qualification
FQ = 2.0 x [{10X
+4Y}/F] where
X is no. of faculty
with Ph.D., Y is no. of faculty with M.Tech., F is no. of faculty required to
comply 1:20 Faculty
Student ratio
(no. of faculty and no.
of students required to be calculated as per 5.1)
5.4
Faculty Retention
·
³ 90% of
required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as
base year (10)
·
³ 75% of
required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as
base year (08)
·
³ 60% of
required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as
base year (06)
·
³ 50% of
required Faculties retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as
base year (04)
·
Otherwise (0)
(Faculty date of
joining; at least three-month (July-April-May) salary statement for each of the
assessment years)
5.5.
Faculty competencies in correlation to Program Specific Criteria.
A. Specialization
B. Research
Publications
C. Course
Developments
D. Other
relevant points
5.6. Innovations
by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning.
A. Statement
of clear goals, use of appropriate methods, significance of results, effective
presentation (4)
B. Availability
of work on the Institute Website (2)
C. Availability
of work for peer review and critique (2)
D. Reproducibility
and Reusability by other scholars for further development (2)
(A. Availability
on Institute website; awareness among faculty and students of the department
B. &
C. Self-explanatory
D. Innovations that
contribute to the improvement of student learning, typically include use of
ICT, instruction delivery, instructional methods, assessment, evaluation etc.)
5.7
Faculty as participants in Faculty development /training activities /STTPs
For each year:
Assessment = 3×Sum/0.5RF
Average assessment over
last three years starting from CAYm1 (Marks limited to 15)
5.8.
Research and Development
5.8.1.
Academic Research
A. Number
of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals, citations, Books/Book
Chapters
etc. (15)
B. PhD
awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (5)
(A. Quality
of publications; publications copy, B. Documentary
evidence)
5.8.2
Sponsored Research
Funded research from
outside; Cumulative during CAYm1, CAYm2 and CAYm3
Amount > 50 Lakh –
20 Marks,
Amount >40 and <
50 Lakh – 15 Marks,
Amount >30 and <
40 Lakh – 10 Marks,
Amount >15 and <
30 Lakh – 5 Marks,
Amount< 15 Lakh – 0
Marks
(Documentary
evidence; Funding agency, Amount, Duration, Research progress; Outcome)
5.8.3
Development Activities.
A. Product
Development
B. Research
laboratories
C. Instructional
materials
D. Working
models/charts/monograms etc.
5.8.4.
Consultancy (From Industry)
Consultancy; Cumulative
during CAYm1, CAYm2 and CAYm3
Amount >10 Lakh – 20
Marks,
Amount <10 and >
8 Lakh – 15 Marks,
Amount < 8 and >
6 Lakh – 10 Marks,
Amount < 6 and >
4 Lakh – 5 Marks,
Amount < 4 and > 2 Lakh –
2 Marks,
Amount < 2 Lakh – 0
Mark
(Documentary
evidence; Funding agency, Amount, Duration, Research progress; Outcome)
5.9.
Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS)
A. A
well-defined performance appraisal and development system instituted for all
the assessment years (5)
B. Its
implementation and effectiveness (5)
(A. Notified
performance appraisal and development system; Appraisal Parameters; Awareness
B. Implementation,
Transparency and Effectiveness)
5.10.
Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc.
• Provision
of Visiting /Adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. (1)
• Minimum
50 hours per year interaction (per year to obtain three marks: 3 x 3 =
9)
0 Comments