Criterion 5: Faculty Information and Contributions

5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR)

1. Availability of eligible HoD for all the Assessment years (05) Otherwise ‘0’ marks
2. Marks to be give proportionally from a max. of 15 to minimum of 10
3. For average of 20:1 to 25:1, ‘0’ for average SFR higher than 25:1

 5.2. Faculty Qualification.

—  FQ = 2.0 x [{10X +7Y}/F] where

—  X is no. of faculty with M.Tech,

—  Y is no. of faculty with B.Tech,

—   F  is no. of faculty required to comply 1:20 Faculty Student ratio (Calculations as per 5.1)

5.3. Faculty Retention.

            % required Faculties retained during the period of assessment Keeping CAYm2 as base year

1. >=  90%  (20)
2. >=  75%  (15)
3. >=  60%  (10)
4. >=  50%  (05)
5. <     50% (0)

 5.4. Faculty as participant in Faculty Development / Training activities.

1. Faculty scores maximum five points for participation
2. Three points - Participant in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program.
3. Five points - Participant >5 days Faculty development program.

            Assessment = 6 × Sum/0.5 Required Faculty.

5.5. Product development, Consultancy, Manufacturing, Contracts, Testing Contracts.

—  5 marks in each based-on documentary evidence. (Consultancy, Manufacturing contracts, Testing Contracts resulting into revenue generation.)

5.6. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS).

            The assessment is based on - 

1. A well-defined system instituted for all the assessment years
2. Its implementation and effectiveness
3. Qualification up-gradation of faculty

 5.7.  Implementation of Career Advancement Scheme.

—  Documented evidence of implementation

Total 150 marks for criterion 5